Categories: SQL Server
Tags:

The primary difference between NVARCHAR and VARCHAR lies in their ability to store data in different character encodings and their memory requirements. Here’s a detailed comparison:

AspectNVARCHARVARCHAR
EncodingStores data in Unicode format (UTF-16), supporting multiple languages and special characters.Stores data in non-Unicode format, limited to a specific code page (e.g., ASCII).
Character SupportSupports international characters (e.g., Chinese, Arabic, emojis).Limited to English-like characters (based on the collation and code page).
Storage SizeUses 2 bytes per character for Unicode storage.Uses 1 byte per character (for standard ASCII characters).
Use CaseIdeal for applications with multilingual data or special characters.Ideal for single-language applications with ASCII-based characters.
PerformanceSlightly slower than VARCHAR due to additional memory usage and processing for Unicode.Slightly faster because it uses less memory for ASCII characters.
Max LengthSupports up to 4,000 characters (for older versions) or 2 GB of storage.Supports up to 8,000 characters (for older versions) or 2 GB of storage.

Key Points to Remember:

  1. Unicode Advantage:
    • If you need to store text in multiple languages (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Hindi), always use NVARCHAR.
    • Unicode ensures that characters from different scripts are handled correctly.
  2. Performance Trade-off:
    • VARCHAR is more efficient for storage and performance when dealing with only ASCII or a single language.
    • However, it lacks the ability to store international characters.
  3. Storage Size Example:
    • For the string “hello”:
      • VARCHAR(10) will use 5 bytes.
      • NVARCHAR(10) will use 10 bytes (2 bytes per character).

Recommendation:

  • Use NVARCHAR if your application handles multilingual data or requires support for special characters.
  • Use VARCHAR if your application deals only with ASCII characters and prioritizes performance and reduced storage.